![]() Such performance increases haven’t been experienced ever since AMD’s K7 Athlon launch back in 1999, when the K7 CPU was over 50% faster than anything Intel had on the market at the time. It would have been incredible, if not impossible, to get this amount of power by upgrading the x86 FPU. The performance improvements are not always this impressive, but generally, if the improvement achieved is more than 30%, it shows that going after the GPU FPU power was the right thing to do. While the bet is valid, it is very hard to put in practice and a lot of software work is required to ensure that programs really know how to tap into that iGPU power.ĬyberLink states that a 360% performance improvement is obvious in PowerDirector 10, when GPU acceleration is activated. ![]() He bet on the fact that only integer performance needed to be increased, as AMD already had a lot of FPU power coming from their GPUs. This was actually an intentional move supported and perpetuated through AMD’s latest designs by its former CEO, Dirk Meyer. The problem is that the company’s new APU has rather mediocre x86 performance, due to the lack of FPU computing power. We got used to see 3D applications using that power, but fast floating point performance is a desirable feature all over the board.ĪMD’s Trinity has a lot of potential and has already proven to be much more efficient than Intel’s Ivy Bridge, and it displayed considerably better gaming performance. AMD needs to work on software development, as relying on Intel’s compilers is a very bad idea.ĬyberLink software company has just updated its media processing software suite with complete support for AMD’s Video Codec Engine (VCE), as announced on its own official website.Įvery GPU and the iGPUs inside APUs have a lot of computing power hidden inside. We talked a lot about AMD’s lack of software optimization right before Trinity’s official launch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |